{"version":1,"lectureId":"01M14TXT0PVMXZ1QRS662NNA4E","attempt":0,"publication":{"slug":"cournot-duopoly-and-best-responses","title":"Cournot Competition: Best-Response Dynamics and the Race to Equilibrium","subject":"economics","summary":"Two identical firms choose quantities in a linear market with constant marginal cost. The lecture derives each firm's best-response curve, locates the Cournot-Nash intersection, and then animates alternating quantity adjustments so convergence is visible and its stability can be justified from the response slopes. The resulting price is compared with monopoly and perfect competition before the final contrast with homogeneous-product Bertrand price competition.","metaDescription":"Watch Cournot firms chase best responses to equilibrium, then compare its price with monopoly, competition, and Bertrand pricing.","transcript":"Two firms will choose quantities. Each red or green curve will record one firm's best answer to the other firm's output. Their crossing is the destination of the lecture. At the yellow crossing, Firm 1 is already answering Firm 2 as well as it can, and Firm 2 is already answering Firm 1. Neither wants to change alone. That is the Cournot-Nash equilibrium. But I do not want that crossing to arrive as a mysterious pair of lines. We will build each line from profit, then let the firms chase one another toward the crossing. Begin with a deliberately simple market. The horizontal coordinate is total quantity Q. The vertical coordinate is the market price P. Demand is the blue line P equals one hundred minus Q. If total output is twenty, buyers pay eighty. If output rises, the price paid for every unit falls. Move total output from twenty to sixty. The market point slides down the demand curve, and price falls from eighty to forty. Quantity decisions therefore interact through one common price. Bring output back to forty. The corresponding price is sixty. We will later recognize this as the output and price a single profit-maximizing firm would choose. With two firms, total quantity is Firm 1's output plus Firm 2's output. The market does not care which firm supplied a unit. It sees only their sum. Both firms have constant marginal cost twenty and no fixed cost. The green line therefore stays flat at twenty, however much either firm produces. A firm's profit is its margin, price minus twenty, multiplied by its own quantity. The important word is own. Firm 1 earns the market margin on q one, not on its rival's production. Substitute the market price and total output. Profit becomes eighty minus q one minus q two, multiplied by the firm's own quantity. That expression contains the strategic tension. Producing another unit sells one more unit, but it also lowers the price received on every unit the firm already sells. Cournot competition asks each firm to choose its own quantity while treating the rival's quantity as given. We now solve that decision for Firm 1, first with a numerical guess and then for every possible guess. Suppose Firm 1 believes Firm 2 will produce twenty units. Firm 1 now faces a one-variable decision: choose q one to maximize its own profit. The blue curve plots that profit against Firm 1's quantity. Profit is zero at quantity zero, rises, reaches a top, and eventually falls as the price effect overwhelms the extra sales. Try q one equal to ten. The market quantity is thirty, price is seventy, and Firm 1 earns a margin of fifty on ten units, or five hundred. Substituting the rival's twenty units leaves sixty minus q one, multiplied by q one. Expanding gives sixty q one minus q one squared. Move the trial quantity to thirty. The point climbs to the top of the profit curve. Here Firm 1 sells thirty units at a margin of thirty. Move farther to fifty. Profit falls back to five hundred. More output is not automatically better, because the common market price has fallen. Differentiate the quadratic. The marginal effect of q one is sixty minus two q one. Setting that equal to zero gives q one equal to thirty. So thirty is Firm 1's best response to a rival output of twenty. Now let the rival's quantity vary instead of fixing it at one number. Put Firm 2's output on the horizontal axis and Firm 1's output on the vertical axis. We want one point for every possible guess about q two. Firm 1's general profit is eighty minus q one minus q two, multiplied by q one. Expanding separates the own-output square from the interaction with the rival. Differentiate with respect to Firm 1's own quantity while holding q two fixed. The first-order condition is eighty minus two q one minus q two equal to zero. Solving gives q one equal to one half of eighty minus q two. This is not one answer. It is a rule assigning a profit-maximizing q one to every possible q two. Plot that rule in red. If Firm 2 produces zero, Firm 1 behaves like the market's sole producer and chooses forty. If Firm 2 produces twenty, Firm 1 chooses the thirty we just found. The red curve slopes downward because the quantities are strategic substitutes. A larger rival output depresses market price, so Firm 1's best reply is to produce less. Firm 2 solves the mirror-image problem. Its profit is the same market margin multiplied by q two. Differentiate with respect to q two. The first-order condition is eighty minus q one minus two q two equal to zero. Solving gives Firm 2's response: q two equals one half of eighty minus q one. The two firms have identical technologies and face the same demand. On axes ordered q two across and q one up, that response appears as the green curve. Every point on it is an output pair where Firm 2 is optimizing against Firm 1. The red curve records where Firm 1 is content. The green curve records where Firm 2 is content. Only their crossing makes both statements true at the same time. Because the firms are identical, the crossing lies on the dashed symmetry line q one equals q two. Call their common output q. Substitute q for the rival's output in either response rule. q equals one half of eighty minus q, so three q equals eighty. Each firm produces eighty thirds, about twenty-six point seven units. The yellow point is therefore the unique crossing of the two best-response curves. This algebra identifies the fixed point. It has not yet shown whether decentralized adjustment finds it. For that, we let the firms respond one after the other and watch the chase. Return to the quantity plane. The red and green response curves are fixed. The blue point will record the firms' current output pair, with q two across and q one up. Start away from equilibrium at q two equal to ten and q one equal to ten. The point is on neither response curve, so both firms currently want to revise. Firm 1 moves first. It treats q two equal to ten as fixed and chooses one half of seventy, so the point moves vertically and lands at thirty-five. Now Firm 2 observes q one equal to thirty-five. Its best response is twenty-two point five, so the point moves horizontally and lands on the green curve. Firm 1 responds again. Against twenty-two point five, its maximizing quantity is twenty-eight point seven five. The red vertical step is already much shorter than the first. Firm 2 answers with twenty-five point six. The green horizontal step is shorter as well. The pair has entered the narrow region between the two curves. Another Firm 1 response gives about twenty-seven point two. It still overshoots the crossing slightly, but by less than before. Firm 2 then chooses about twenty-six point four. The alternating steps produce a staircase: red movements are Firm 1, and green movements are Firm 2. Firm 1 now moves to about twenty-six point eight. The vertical correction has become small enough that the displayed coordinates begin to agree in their first two digits. Firm 2 replies with about twenty-six point six. The horizontal correction is smaller again. One more Firm 1 response gives about twenty-six point seven. The point is now visually almost at the crossing. Firm 2 answers at about twenty-six point seven as well. The staircase has tightened around the yellow Cournot-Nash point. The motion itself suggests stability. A displacement away from the crossing generates a smaller response in the opposite direction, then a still smaller reply. We can measure that shrinkage. Let e one and e two denote each firm's output minus its equilibrium output. Firm 1's response curve has slope minus one half. Therefore Firm 1's new error is minus one half of Firm 2's old error. Firm 2's response also has slope minus one half. Its new error is minus one half of Firm 1's new error. Multiplying the two slopes gives positive one quarter. After one complete Firm 1 and Firm 2 round, the remaining error has only one quarter of its previous magnitude. That is why the staircase contracts rather than exploding outward. The negative slopes make successive corrections alternate sides, while their product being smaller than one makes the corrections shrink. The conclusion is conditional, not universal. We assumed exact best responses, one firm moving at a time, and an unchanged demand and cost environment. Different adjustment rules can create slower motion, simultaneous jumps, or instability. Under this benchmark, however, equilibrium is both a pair of mutual best responses and the stable fixed point of the visible chase. We can now ask what market price that fixed point produces. Use the same demand and cost curves to compare three market organizations. The blue line is demand and the green line is marginal cost twenty. Begin with monopoly. One owner controls the entire market quantity, so its total revenue is price times Q: one hundred minus Q, multiplied by Q. Differentiating total revenue gives marginal revenue one hundred minus two Q. The red marginal-revenue curve falls twice as quickly as demand. The monopolist chooses quantity where marginal revenue equals marginal cost. One hundred minus two Q equals twenty. Solving gives monopoly quantity forty. Move up from quantity forty to demand, and buyers pay the monopoly price sixty. Now return to Cournot. Each firm produces eighty thirds, so together they supply one hundred sixty thirds, about fifty-three point three units. Demand at that total quantity gives price one hundred forty thirds, about forty-six point seven. The yellow Cournot point lies down and to the right of monopoly. Why does Cournot produce more than monopoly? Each firm considers how its own output lowers price, but it does not fully internalize the price loss imposed on the rival's units. For perfect competition, firms take price as given and expand until price equals marginal cost. Demand reaches price twenty at total quantity eighty. The ordering is now visible. Monopoly restricts output the most and has the highest price. Cournot lies between. Perfect competition has the largest output and the lowest price. Numerically, price falls from sixty under monopoly, to about forty-six point seven under Cournot, to twenty under perfect competition. The table collects the three outcomes. Read the headings first: market organization, total quantity, and market price. Monopoly produces forty and charges sixty. That row is the benchmark for coordinated quantity restriction. Cournot duopoly produces about fifty-three point three and charges about forty-six point seven. Strategic quantity competition moves the market toward competition, but not all the way. Perfect competition produces eighty and sets price equal to marginal cost, twenty. Relative to Cournot, another twenty-six point seven units are traded. The Cournot result is therefore intermediate because firms compete through quantities while retaining some control over market price. If firms compete directly through prices, the strategic logic changes sharply. Cournot firms commit to quantities and let market demand determine one common price. Bertrand competition reverses the strategic choice: each firm posts a price. Keep the comparison disciplined. The product is identical, both firms have marginal cost twenty, either firm can serve the market, and buyers choose the lower price. Suppose Firm 1 posts fifty while Firm 2 posts forty-five. The two colored points display those prices on the same scale. The lower-price firm serves the market. Buyers do not pay fifty for what they can buy at forty-five, so Firm 2 sells and Firm 1 sells nothing. Firm 1 can respond by posting forty-four. It gives up one unit of margin relative to forty-five, but captures the market instead of selling zero. Firm 2 can answer with forty-three. Unlike the Cournot chase, an attractive response here is not a movement toward a smooth quantity curve. It is a price just below the rival. As long as the lower price remains above marginal cost, the higher-price firm can profitably undercut it. So no common price above twenty can be an equilibrium. Continue the undercutting pressure toward cost. Both price points move down the scale and arrive at twenty. At a common price of twenty, neither firm can gain by charging more, because it would lose its customers. Neither can gain by charging less, because price would fall below marginal cost. The Bertrand equilibrium is therefore price equal to marginal cost under these assumptions. Total demand at price twenty is eighty, the same total output as the perfectly competitive benchmark. This is the central contrast. Under Cournot, a firm choosing more output depresses the price on all units, so each firm restrains quantity. Under Bertrand, a slightly lower price can redirect the whole market. Quantity competition therefore leaves price above marginal cost in our two-firm example. Direct price competition drives the benchmark price down to marginal cost. Place the two games side by side. The table names the strategic choice, equilibrium price, and total output. In Cournot, firms choose quantities. Their best-response crossing gives price about forty-six point seven and total output about fifty-three point three. In the homogeneous-product Bertrand benchmark, firms choose prices. Undercutting gives price twenty and total output eighty. Do not treat that sharp result as a law for every price-setting market. If products differ, customers may stay with a higher-price seller. If capacity is limited, the cheaper firm may be unable to serve everyone. Different marginal costs, search costs, repeated interaction, and capacity constraints can also sustain prices above the simplest Bertrand level. The comparison works because we held the environment fixed and changed the strategic variable. The full lesson is now one connected argument. Demand turns two quantities into one price. Profit maximization turns each rival quantity into a best response. Alternating responses converge to the Cournot crossing. That crossing prices below monopoly but above competition, while direct price setting creates the undercutting race to marginal cost.","watch":{"version":1,"scenes":[{"title":"The Market and the Destination","start":0,"end":158.3292083333333,"objects":{"assumptions":"a Panel that says \"Two firms sell one homogeneous good. Market price is determined by total output. Both firms have marginal cost 20 and no fixed cost.\"","cost":"a FunctionPlot [green] labelled \"upright(\"MC\")=20\" drawn in market (function=<function>, x_range=(0.0, 100.0))","demand":"a FunctionPlot [blue] labelled \"P=100-Q\" drawn in market (function=<function>, x_range=(0.0, 100.0))","demand_equation":"a Math [text] that says \"$P(Q)=100-Q$\"","firm_profit":"a Math [text] that says \"$pi_i=(P-20)q_i$\"","market":"an Axes (x_range=(0.0, 105.0), y_range=(0.0, 105.0), x_ticks_every=20.0)","market_heading":"a Heading that says \"A Linear Market\"","market_point":"a PlotPoint [yellow] labelled \"P(Q)\" drawn in market (target='demand', x=<VariableNumber total_quantity = 40.0>)","preview":"an Axes (x_range=(0.0, 82.0), y_range=(0.0, 82.0), aspect=(1.0, 1.0))","preview_br1":"a FunctionPlot [red] labelled \"upright(\"BR\")_1\" drawn in preview (function=<function>, x_range=(0.0, 80.0))","preview_br2":"a FunctionPlot [green] labelled \"upright(\"BR\")_2\" drawn in preview (function=<function>, x_range=(0.0, 40.0))","preview_equilibrium":"a Point [yellow] labelled \"N\" drawn in preview (location=(26.666666666666668, 26.666666666666668))","preview_heading":"a Heading that says \"Two Best Responses, One Crossing\"","quantity_identity":"a Math [text] that says \"$Q=q_1+q_2$\"","quantity_line":"a Line [yellow] drawn in market (start=(<VariableNumber total_quantity = 40.0>, 0.0), end=(<VariableNumber total_quantity = 40.0>, (100.0 - total_quantit…, dashed=True)","total_quantity":"a VariableNumber (initial_value=20.0, format_spec='.0f')"},"beats":[{"start":0,"say":"Two firms will choose quantities. Each red or green curve will record one firm's best answer to the other firm's output. Their crossing is the destination of the lecture.","live":[],"does":[[0,"preview_heading is shown on the screen, written out."],[0,"preview is shown on the screen, written out."],[2.694,"preview_br1 is shown on the screen, drawn."],[3.03,"preview_br2 is shown on the screen, drawn."]]},{"start":11.084,"say":"At the yellow crossing, Firm 1 is already answering Firm 2 as well as it can, and Firm 2 is already answering Firm 1. Neither wants to change alone. That is the Cournot-Nash equilibrium.","live":["preview","preview_heading","preview_br1","preview_br2"],"does":[[11.699,"preview_equilibrium is shown on the screen, written out."],[23.250999999999998,"preview_equilibrium is indicated — a transient flash."]]},{"start":25.0005,"say":"But I do not want that crossing to arrive as a mysterious pair of lines. We will build each line from profit, then let the firms chase one another toward the crossing.","live":["preview","preview_heading","preview_br1","preview_br2","preview_equilibrium"],"does":[[35.6245,"preview is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[35.6245,"preview_br1 is hidden from the screen — preview left the board."],[35.6245,"preview_br2 is hidden from the screen — preview left the board."],[35.6245,"preview_equilibrium is hidden from the screen — preview left the board."],[35.6245,"preview_heading is hidden from the screen — left the board."]]},{"start":36.8245,"say":"Begin with a deliberately simple market. The horizontal coordinate is total quantity Q. The vertical coordinate is the market price P.","live":[],"does":[[36.8245,"market_heading is shown on the screen, written out."],[39.042,"market is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":46.921,"say":"Demand is the blue line P equals one hundred minus Q. If total output is twenty, buyers pay eighty. If output rises, the price paid for every unit falls.","live":["market","market_heading"],"does":[[48.163,"demand is shown on the screen, drawn."],[49.359,"demand_equation is shown on the screen, written out."],[52.575,"market_point is shown on the screen, written out."],[52.575,"quantity_line is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":59.41,"say":"Move total output from twenty to sixty. The market point slides down the demand curve, and price falls from eighty to forty. Quantity decisions therefore interact through one common price.","live":["demand_equation","market","market_heading","demand","market_point","quantity_line"],"does":[[59.757999999999996,"market_point is redrawn as the numbers it depends on change."],[59.757999999999996,"quantity_line is redrawn as the numbers it depends on change."],[59.757999999999996,"total_quantity ticks to 60.0."]]},{"start":71.64349999999999,"say":"Bring output back to forty. The corresponding price is sixty. We will later recognize this as the output and price a single profit-maximizing firm would choose.","live":null,"does":[[72.57199999999999,"market_point is redrawn as the numbers it depends on change."],[72.57199999999999,"quantity_line is redrawn as the numbers it depends on change."],[72.57199999999999,"total_quantity ticks to 40.0."]]},{"start":83.26199999999999,"say":"With two firms, total quantity is Firm 1's output plus Firm 2's output. The market does not care which firm supplied a unit. It sees only their sum.","live":null,"does":[[83.26199999999999,"quantity_identity is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":95.32099999999998,"say":"Both firms have constant marginal cost twenty and no fixed cost. The green line therefore stays flat at twenty, however much either firm produces.","live":["demand_equation","quantity_identity","market","market_heading","demand","market_point","quantity_line"],"does":[[96.52799999999999,"assumptions is shown on the screen, written out."],[100.52199999999999,"cost is shown on the screen, drawn."]]},{"start":106.07949999999998,"say":"A firm's profit is its margin, price minus twenty, multiplied by its own quantity. The important word is own. Firm 1 earns the market margin on q one, not on its rival's production.","live":["assumptions","demand_equation","quantity_identity","market","market_heading","demand","market_point","quantity_line","cost"],"does":[[106.95,"firm_profit is shown on the screen, written out."],[107.693,"firm_profit (the \"P-20\" part) is emphasized."],[110.921,"firm_profit (the \"P-20\" part) is no longer emphasized."],[110.921,"firm_profit (the \"q_i\" part) is emphasized."],[119.79149999999998,"firm_profit (the \"q_i\" part) is no longer emphasized."]]},{"start":120.39149999999998,"say":"Substitute the market price and total output. Profit becomes eighty minus q one minus q two, multiplied by the firm's own quantity.","live":["assumptions","demand_equation","quantity_identity","firm_profit","market","market_heading","demand","market_point","quantity_line","cost"],"does":[[120.74,"firm_profit becomes \"$pi_i=(80-q_1-q_2)q_i$\"."]]},{"start":131.01049999999998,"say":"That expression contains the strategic tension. Producing another unit sells one more unit, but it also lowers the price received on every unit the firm already sells.","live":null,"does":[[135.26,"firm_profit (the \"q_i\" part) is emphasized."],[138.348,"firm_profit (the \"80-q_1-q_2\" part) is emphasized."],[138.348,"firm_profit (the \"q_i\" part) is no longer emphasized."],[142.4235,"firm_profit (the \"80-q_1-q_2\" part) is no longer emphasized."]]},{"start":143.02349999999998,"say":"Cournot competition asks each firm to choose its own quantity while treating the rival's quantity as given. We now solve that decision for Firm 1, first with a numerical guess and then for every possible guess.","live":null,"does":[[157.28754166666664,"assumptions is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[157.28754166666664,"demand_equation is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[157.28754166666664,"firm_profit is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[157.28754166666664,"market is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[157.28754166666664,"demand is hidden from the screen — market left the board."],[157.28754166666664,"market_point is hidden from the screen — market left the board."],[157.28754166666664,"quantity_line is hidden from the screen — market left the board."],[157.28754166666664,"cost is hidden from the screen — market left the board."],[157.28754166666664,"market_heading is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[157.28754166666664,"quantity_identity is hidden from the screen — left the board."]]}]},{"title":"Building the Best-Response Curves","start":158.3292083333333,"end":424.37760416666663,"objects":{"br1_curve":"a FunctionPlot [red] labelled \"upright(\"BR\")_1(q_2)\" drawn in response_axes (function=<function>, x_range=(0.0, 80.0))","br2_curve":"a FunctionPlot [green] labelled \"upright(\"BR\")_2(q_1)\" drawn in response_axes (function=<function>, x_range=(0.0, 40.0))","concrete_work":"a Derivation [text] that says \"$pi_1(q_1|q_2=20)&=(80-q_1-20)q_1 \\ &=(60-q_1)q_1 \\ &=60q_1-q_1^2 \\ frac(partial pi_1,partial q_1)&=60-2q_1=0 \\ q_1^*&=30$\"","equilibrium_answer":"a Math [text] that says \"$(q_1^*,q_2^*)=(frac(80,3),frac(80,3))$\"","equilibrium_point":"a Point [yellow] labelled \"N\" drawn in response_axes (location=(26.666666666666668, 26.666666666666668))","equilibrium_work":"a Derivation [text] that says \"$q_1=q_2=q \\ q&=frac(80-q,2) \\ 3q&=80 \\ q&=frac(80,3) approx 26.7$\"","firm_one_answer":"a Math [text] that says \"$upright(\"BR\")_1(q_2)=frac(80-q_2,2)$\"","firm_one_work":"a Derivation [text] that says \"$pi_1&=(80-q_1-q_2)q_1 \\ &=80q_1-q_1^2-q_1q_2 \\ frac(partial pi_1,partial q_1)&=80-2q_1-q_2=0 \\ q_1&=frac(80-q_2,2)$\"","firm_two_answer":"a Math [text] that says \"$upright(\"BR\")_2(q_1)=frac(80-q_1,2)$\"","firm_two_work":"a Derivation [text] that says \"$pi_2&=(80-q_1-q_2)q_2 \\ frac(partial pi_2,partial q_2)&=80-q_1-2q_2=0 \\ q_2&=frac(80-q_1,2)$\"","head_crossing":"a Heading that says \"The Cournot-Nash Crossing\"","head_one":"a Heading that says \"Firm 1's Best Response\"","head_two":"a Heading that says \"Firm 2's Best Response\"","point":"a Point [yellow] drawn in response_axes (location=(0.0, 40.0))","point_2":"a Point [yellow] drawn in response_axes (location=(20.0, 30.0))","profit_axes":"an Axes (x_range=(0.0, 62.0), y_range=(0.0, 960.0), x_ticks_every=10.0)","profit_curve":"a FunctionPlot [blue] labelled \"pi_1(q_1|q_2=20)\" drawn in profit_axes (function=<function>, x_range=(0.0, 60.0))","question":"a Panel that says \"If Firm 2 produces 20 units, which quantity maximizes Firm 1's profit?\"","response_axes":"an Axes (x_range=(0.0, 82.0), y_range=(0.0, 82.0), aspect=(1.0, 1.0))","symmetry_line":"a Line [gray] labelled \"q_1=q_2\" drawn in response_axes (end=(80.0, 80.0), dashed=True)","trial":"a VariableNumber (initial_value=10.0, format_spec='.0f')","trial_point":"a PlotPoint [yellow] labelled \"10\" drawn in profit_axes (target='profit_curve', x=<VariableNumber trial = 30.0>)"},"beats":[{"start":158.3292083333333,"say":"Suppose Firm 1 believes Firm 2 will produce twenty units. Firm 1 now faces a one-variable decision: choose q one to maximize its own profit.","live":[],"does":[[158.3292083333333,"question is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":169.90070833333328,"say":"The blue curve plots that profit against Firm 1's quantity. Profit is zero at quantity zero, rises, reaches a top, and eventually falls as the price effect overwhelms the extra sales.","live":["question"],"does":[[169.90070833333328,"profit_axes is shown on the screen, written out."],[170.3652083333333,"profit_curve is shown on the screen, drawn."]]},{"start":183.6437083333333,"say":"Try q one equal to ten. The market quantity is thirty, price is seventy, and Firm 1 earns a margin of fifty on ten units, or five hundred.","live":["profit_axes","question","profit_curve"],"does":[[185.4892083333333,"profit_axes moves to a new place on the board."],[185.4892083333333,"trial_point is shown on the screen, written out."],[185.4892083333333,"concrete_work is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":194.9832083333333,"say":"Substituting the rival's twenty units leaves sixty minus q one, multiplied by q one. Expanding gives sixty q one minus q one squared.","live":["profit_axes","question","profit_curve","trial_point"],"does":[[197.7582083333333,"concrete_work is shown on the screen, written out."],[201.8792083333333,"concrete_work is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":206.5082083333333,"say":"Move the trial quantity to thirty. The point climbs to the top of the profit curve. Here Firm 1 sells thirty units at a margin of thirty.","live":null,"does":[[208.1102083333333,"trial_point is redrawn as the numbers it depends on change."],[208.1102083333333,"trial ticks to 30.0."],[216.1557083333333,"trial_point is indicated — a transient flash."]]},{"start":216.7557083333333,"say":"Move farther to fifty. Profit falls back to five hundred. More output is not automatically better, because the common market price has fallen.","live":null,"does":[[217.9172083333333,"trial_point is redrawn as the numbers it depends on change."],[217.9172083333333,"trial ticks to 50.0."]]},{"start":227.3867083333333,"say":"Differentiate the quadratic. The marginal effect of q one is sixty minus two q one. Setting that equal to zero gives q one equal to thirty.","live":null,"does":[[227.7352083333333,"concrete_work is shown on the screen, written out."],[237.8592083333333,"concrete_work is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":239.2952083333333,"say":"So thirty is Firm 1's best response to a rival output of twenty. Now let the rival's quantity vary instead of fixing it at one number.","live":null,"does":[[239.9222083333333,"trial_point is redrawn as the numbers it depends on change."],[239.9222083333333,"trial ticks to 30.0."],[248.9202083333333,"concrete_work is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[248.9202083333333,"profit_axes is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[248.9202083333333,"profit_curve is hidden from the screen — profit_axes left the board."],[248.9202083333333,"trial_point is hidden from the screen — profit_axes left the board."],[248.9202083333333,"question is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[248.9202083333333,"A box is drawn around concrete_work."]]},{"start":250.12020833333332,"say":"Put Firm 2's output on the horizontal axis and Firm 1's output on the vertical axis. We want one point for every possible guess about q two.","live":[],"does":[[250.12020833333332,"head_one is shown on the screen, written out."],[252.1522083333333,"response_axes is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":261.34320833333334,"say":"Firm 1's general profit is eighty minus q one minus q two, multiplied by q one. Expanding separates the own-output square from the interaction with the rival.","live":["response_axes","head_one"],"does":[[262.9332083333333,"response_axes moves to a new place on the board."],[262.9332083333333,"firm_one_work is shown on the screen, written out."],[268.4832083333333,"firm_one_work is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":273.50670833333334,"say":"Differentiate with respect to Firm 1's own quantity while holding q two fixed. The first-order condition is eighty minus two q one minus q two equal to zero.","live":null,"does":[[273.8552083333333,"firm_one_work is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":286.7492083333333,"say":"Solving gives q one equal to one half of eighty minus q two. This is not one answer. It is a rule assigning a profit-maximizing q one to every possible q two.","live":null,"does":[[287.0972083333333,"firm_one_work is shown on the screen, written out."],[294.2842083333333,"firm_one_answer is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":299.6617083333333,"say":"Plot that rule in red. If Firm 2 produces zero, Firm 1 behaves like the market's sole producer and chooses forty. If Firm 2 produces twenty, Firm 1 chooses the thirty we just found.","live":["firm_one_answer","response_axes","head_one"],"does":[[300.9912083333333,"br1_curve is shown on the screen, drawn."],[307.6092083333333,"point is shown on the screen, grown."],[309.6092083333333,"point is hidden from the screen."],[312.02120833333333,"point_2 is shown on the screen, grown."],[314.02120833333333,"point_2 is hidden from the screen."]]},{"start":314.16470833333335,"say":"The red curve slopes downward because the quantities are strategic substitutes. A larger rival output depresses market price, so Firm 1's best reply is to produce less.","live":["firm_one_answer","response_axes","head_one","br1_curve"],"does":[[315.65120833333333,"br1_curve is indicated — a transient flash."],[325.69370833333335,"firm_one_answer is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[325.69370833333335,"firm_one_work is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[325.69370833333335,"head_one is hidden from the screen — left the board."]]},{"start":326.8937083333333,"say":"Firm 2 solves the mirror-image problem. Its profit is the same market margin multiplied by q two.","live":["response_axes","br1_curve"],"does":[[326.8937083333333,"head_two is shown on the screen, written out."],[330.5272083333333,"firm_two_work is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":334.7267083333333,"say":"Differentiate with respect to q two. The first-order condition is eighty minus q one minus two q two equal to zero.","live":["response_axes","br1_curve","head_two"],"does":[[335.0752083333333,"firm_two_work is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":345.94370833333335,"say":"Solving gives Firm 2's response: q two equals one half of eighty minus q one. The two firms have identical technologies and face the same demand.","live":null,"does":[[346.3442083333333,"firm_two_work is shown on the screen, written out."],[347.98120833333326,"firm_two_answer is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":357.3647083333333,"say":"On axes ordered q two across and q one up, that response appears as the green curve. Every point on it is an output pair where Firm 2 is optimizing against Firm 1.","live":["response_axes","br1_curve","firm_two_answer","head_two"],"does":[[362.97720833333324,"br2_curve is shown on the screen, drawn."]]},{"start":370.4797083333333,"say":"The red curve records where Firm 1 is content. The green curve records where Firm 2 is content. Only their crossing makes both statements true at the same time.","live":["response_axes","br1_curve","firm_two_answer","head_two","br2_curve"],"does":[[370.8682083333333,"br1_curve is indicated — a transient flash."],[373.9452083333333,"br2_curve is indicated — a transient flash."],[380.5277083333333,"response_axes moves to a new place on the board."],[380.5277083333333,"firm_two_answer is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[380.5277083333333,"firm_two_work is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[380.5277083333333,"head_two is hidden from the screen — left the board."]]},{"start":381.72770833333334,"say":"Because the firms are identical, the crossing lies on the dashed symmetry line q one equals q two. Call their common output q.","live":["response_axes","br1_curve","br2_curve"],"does":[[381.72770833333334,"head_crossing is shown on the screen, written out."],[385.1872083333333,"symmetry_line is shown on the screen, drawn."],[389.64520833333324,"equilibrium_work is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":391.84770833333334,"say":"Substitute q for the rival's output in either response rule. q equals one half of eighty minus q, so three q equals eighty.","live":["response_axes","br1_curve","br2_curve","head_crossing","symmetry_line"],"does":[[392.10320833333327,"equilibrium_work is shown on the screen, written out."],[399.1622083333333,"equilibrium_work is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":401.68920833333334,"say":"Each firm produces eighty thirds, about twenty-six point seven units. The yellow point is therefore the unique crossing of the two best-response curves.","live":null,"does":[[402.0372083333333,"equilibrium_answer is shown on the screen, written out."],[404.59120833333327,"equilibrium_work is shown on the screen, written out."],[407.0762083333333,"equilibrium_point is shown on the screen, written out."],[411.5227083333333,"A box is drawn around equilibrium_answer."]]},{"start":412.1227083333333,"say":"This algebra identifies the fixed point. It has not yet shown whether decentralized adjustment finds it. For that, we let the firms respond one after the other and watch the chase.","live":["response_axes","br1_curve","br2_curve","equilibrium_answer","head_crossing","symmetry_line","equilibrium_point"],"does":[[423.3359375,"equilibrium_answer is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[423.3359375,"equilibrium_work is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[423.3359375,"head_crossing is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[423.3359375,"response_axes is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[423.3359375,"br1_curve is hidden from the screen — response_axes left the board."],[423.3359375,"br2_curve is hidden from the screen — response_axes left the board."],[423.3359375,"symmetry_line is hidden from the screen — response_axes left the board."],[423.3359375,"equilibrium_point is hidden from the screen — response_axes left the board."]]}]},{"title":"The Best-Response Chase","start":424.37760416666663,"end":637.1149791666667,"objects":{"axes":"an Axes (x_range=(0.0, 45.0), y_range=(0.0, 45.0), aspect=(1.0, 1.0))","br1":"a FunctionPlot [red] labelled \"upright(\"BR\")_1\" drawn in axes (function=<function>, x_range=(0.0, 45.0))","br2":"a FunctionPlot [green] labelled \"upright(\"BR\")_2\" drawn in axes (function=<function>, x_range=(17.5, 40.0))","contraction":"a Derivation [text] that says \"$e_1^(upright(\"new\"))&=-frac(1,2)e_2^(upright(\"old\")) \\ e_2^(upright(\"new\"))&=-frac(1,2)e_1^(upright(\"new\")) \\ &=frac(1,4)e_2^(upright(\"old\"))$\"","equilibrium":"a Point [yellow] labelled \"N\" drawn in axes (location=(26.666666666666668, 26.666666666666668))","heading":"a Heading that says \"Alternating Best Responses\"","q1":"a VariableNumber (initial_value=10.0, format_spec='.1f')","q2":"a VariableNumber (initial_value=10.0, format_spec='.1f')","rule_one":"a Math [text] that says \"$q_1 arrow.r upright(\"BR\")_1(q_2)$\"","rule_two":"a Math [text] that says \"$q_2 arrow.r upright(\"BR\")_2(q_1)$\"","stability_heading":"a Heading that says \"Why the Chase Contracts\"","state":"a Point [blue] labelled \"(10.0, 10.0)\" drawn in axes (location=(<VariableNumber q2 = 26.650390625>, <VariableNumber q1 = 26.69…)","step_1":"a Line [red] drawn in axes (start=(10.0, 10.0), end=(10.0, 35.0))","step_10":"a Line [green] drawn in axes (start=(26.6015625, 26.69921875), end=(26.650390625, 26.69921875))","step_2":"a Line [green] drawn in axes (start=(10.0, 35.0), end=(22.5, 35.0))","step_3":"a Line [red] drawn in axes (start=(22.5, 35.0), end=(22.5, 28.75))","step_4":"a Line [green] drawn in axes (start=(22.5, 28.75), end=(25.625, 28.75))","step_5":"a Line [red] drawn in axes (start=(25.625, 28.75), end=(25.625, 27.1875))","step_6":"a Line [green] drawn in axes (start=(25.625, 27.1875), end=(26.40625, 27.1875))","step_7":"a Line [red] drawn in axes (start=(26.40625, 27.1875), end=(26.40625, 26.796875))","step_8":"a Line [green] drawn in axes (start=(26.40625, 26.796875), end=(26.6015625, 26.796875))","step_9":"a Line [red] drawn in axes (start=(26.6015625, 26.796875), end=(26.6015625, 26.69921875))"},"beats":[{"start":424.37760416666663,"say":"Return to the quantity plane. The red and green response curves are fixed. The blue point will record the firms' current output pair, with q two across and q one up.","live":[],"does":[[424.37760416666663,"heading is shown on the screen, written out."],[424.37760416666663,"axes is shown on the screen, written out."],[426.62960416666664,"br1 is shown on the screen, drawn."],[426.9546041666666,"br2 is shown on the screen, drawn."]]},{"start":434.91560416666664,"say":"Start away from equilibrium at q two equal to ten and q one equal to ten. The point is on neither response curve, so both firms currently want to revise.","live":["axes","heading","br1","br2"],"does":[[435.26360416666665,"state is shown on the screen, written out."],[443.6926041666666,"axes moves to a new place on the board."],[443.6926041666666,"rule_one is shown on the screen, written out."],[444.88860416666665,"rule_two is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":446.4406041666666,"say":"Firm 1 moves first. It treats q two equal to ten as fixed and chooses one half of seventy, so the point moves vertically and lands at thirty-five.","live":["rule_one","rule_two","axes","heading","br1","br2","state"],"does":[[447.41560416666664,"state is redrawn as the numbers it depends on change."],[447.41560416666664,"q1 ticks to 35.0."],[455.2406041666666,"step_1 is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":456.99010416666664,"say":"Now Firm 2 observes q one equal to thirty-five. Its best response is twenty-two point five, so the point moves horizontally and lands on the green curve.","live":["rule_one","rule_two","axes","heading","br1","br2","state","step_1"],"does":[[464.90860416666663,"state is redrawn as the numbers it depends on change."],[464.90860416666663,"q2 ticks to 22.5."],[466.7196041666666,"step_2 is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":468.43410416666666,"say":"Firm 1 responds again. Against twenty-two point five, its maximizing quantity is twenty-eight point seven five. The red vertical step is already much shorter than the first.","live":["rule_one","rule_two","axes","heading","br1","br2","state","step_1","step_2"],"does":[[469.3396041666666,"state is redrawn as the numbers it depends on change."],[469.3396041666666,"q1 ticks to 28.75."],[476.9796041666666,"step_3 is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":480.64410416666664,"say":"Firm 2 answers with twenty-five point six. The green horizontal step is shorter as well. The pair has entered the narrow region between the two curves.","live":["rule_one","rule_two","axes","heading","br1","br2","state","step_1","step_2","step_3"],"does":[[481.5616041666666,"state is redrawn as the numbers it depends on change."],[481.5616041666666,"q2 ticks to 25.625."],[484.25460416666664,"step_4 is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":490.9041041666666,"say":"Another Firm 1 response gives about twenty-seven point two. It still overshoots the crossing slightly, but by less than before.","live":["rule_one","rule_two","axes","heading","br1","br2","state","step_1","step_2","step_3","step_4"],"does":[[492.6806041666666,"state is redrawn as the numbers it depends on change."],[492.6806041666666,"q1 ticks to 27.1875."],[496.30260416666664,"step_5 is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":499.4336041666666,"say":"Firm 2 then chooses about twenty-six point four. The alternating steps produce a staircase: red movements are Firm 1, and green movements are Firm 2.","live":["rule_one","rule_two","axes","heading","br1","br2","state","step_1","step_2","step_3","step_4","step_5"],"does":[[500.61760416666664,"state is redrawn as the numbers it depends on change."],[500.61760416666664,"q2 ticks to 26.40625."],[508.17560416666663,"step_6 is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":510.62210416666665,"say":"Firm 1 now moves to about twenty-six point eight. The vertical correction has become small enough that the displayed coordinates begin to agree in their first two digits.","live":["rule_one","rule_two","axes","heading","br1","br2","state","step_1","step_2","step_3","step_4","step_5","step_6"],"does":[[511.8066041666666,"state is redrawn as the numbers it depends on change."],[511.8066041666666,"q1 ticks to 26.796875."],[517.4486041666667,"step_7 is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":521.0326041666666,"say":"Firm 2 replies with about twenty-six point six. The horizontal correction is smaller again.","live":["rule_one","rule_two","axes","heading","br1","br2","state","step_1","step_2","step_3","step_4","step_5","step_6","step_7"],"does":[[522.0306041666666,"state is redrawn as the numbers it depends on change."],[522.0306041666666,"q2 ticks to 26.6015625."],[527.6621041666666,"step_8 is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":528.2621041666666,"say":"One more Firm 1 response gives about twenty-six point seven. The point is now visually almost at the crossing.","live":["rule_one","rule_two","axes","heading","br1","br2","state","step_1","step_2","step_3","step_4","step_5","step_6","step_7","step_8"],"does":[[530.3746041666666,"state is redrawn as the numbers it depends on change."],[530.3746041666666,"q1 ticks to 26.69921875."],[535.9831041666666,"step_9 is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":536.5831041666667,"say":"Firm 2 answers at about twenty-six point seven as well. The staircase has tightened around the yellow Cournot-Nash point.","live":["rule_one","rule_two","axes","heading","br1","br2","state","step_1","step_2","step_3","step_4","step_5","step_6","step_7","step_8","step_9"],"does":[[537.6396041666666,"state is redrawn as the numbers it depends on change."],[537.6396041666666,"q2 ticks to 26.650390625."],[542.6316041666666,"step_10 is shown on the screen, written out."],[542.6316041666666,"equilibrium is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":544.8571041666667,"say":"The motion itself suggests stability. A displacement away from the crossing generates a smaller response in the opposite direction, then a still smaller reply.","live":["rule_one","rule_two","axes","heading","br1","br2","state","step_1","step_2","step_3","step_4","step_5","step_6","step_7","step_8","step_9","step_10","equilibrium"],"does":[[549.1876041666666,"equilibrium is indicated — a transient flash."]]},{"start":555.4416041666666,"say":"We can measure that shrinkage. Let e one and e two denote each firm's output minus its equilibrium output.","live":null,"does":[[555.4416041666666,"heading is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[555.4416041666666,"rule_one is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[555.4416041666666,"rule_two is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[555.4416041666666,"stability_heading is shown on the screen, written out."],[556.7186041666666,"contraction is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":563.3791041666666,"say":"Firm 1's response curve has slope minus one half. Therefore Firm 1's new error is minus one half of Firm 2's old error.","live":["axes","br1","br2","state","step_1","step_2","step_3","step_4","step_5","step_6","step_7","step_8","step_9","step_10","equilibrium","stability_heading"],"does":[[566.0726041666667,"contraction (the \"-frac(1,2)\" part) is emphasized."],[573.0966041666666,"contraction (the \"-frac(1,2)\" part) is no longer emphasized."]]},{"start":573.6966041666666,"say":"Firm 2's response also has slope minus one half. Its new error is minus one half of Firm 1's new error.","live":null,"does":[[573.6966041666666,"contraction is shown on the screen, written out."],[576.1236041666666,"contraction (the \"-frac(1,2)\" part) is emphasized."],[581.6496041666667,"contraction (the \"-frac(1,2)\" part) is no longer emphasized."]]},{"start":582.2496041666666,"say":"Multiplying the two slopes gives positive one quarter. After one complete Firm 1 and Firm 2 round, the remaining error has only one quarter of its previous magnitude.","live":null,"does":[[584.7916041666666,"contraction is shown on the screen, written out."],[584.7916041666666,"contraction (the \"frac(1,4)\" part) is emphasized."],[593.0346041666667,"contraction (the \"frac(1,4)\" part) is no longer emphasized."]]},{"start":593.6346041666666,"say":"That is why the staircase contracts rather than exploding outward. The negative slopes make successive corrections alternate sides, while their product being smaller than one makes the corrections shrink.","live":null,"does":[[602.7946041666665,"contraction (the \"frac(1,4)\" part) is indicated — a transient flash."]]},{"start":606.0536041666667,"say":"The conclusion is conditional, not universal. We assumed exact best responses, one firm moving at a time, and an unchanged demand and cost environment. Different adjustment rules can create slower motion, simultaneous jumps, or instability.","live":null,"does":[]},{"start":624.0796041666666,"say":"Under this benchmark, however, equilibrium is both a pair of mutual best responses and the stable fixed point of the visible chase. We can now ask what market price that fixed point produces.","live":null,"does":[[630.0006041666666,"equilibrium is indicated — a transient flash."],[636.0733124999999,"axes is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[636.0733124999999,"br1 is hidden from the screen — axes left the board."],[636.0733124999999,"br2 is hidden from the screen — axes left the board."],[636.0733124999999,"state is hidden from the screen — axes left the board."],[636.0733124999999,"step_1 is hidden from the screen — axes left the board."],[636.0733124999999,"step_2 is hidden from the screen — axes left the board."],[636.0733124999999,"step_3 is hidden from the screen — axes left the board."],[636.0733124999999,"step_4 is hidden from the screen — axes left the board."],[636.0733124999999,"step_5 is hidden from the screen — axes left the board."],[636.0733124999999,"step_6 is hidden from the screen — axes left the board."],[636.0733124999999,"step_7 is hidden from the screen — axes left the board."],[636.0733124999999,"step_8 is hidden from the screen — axes left the board."],[636.0733124999999,"step_9 is hidden from the screen — axes left the board."],[636.0733124999999,"step_10 is hidden from the screen — axes left the board."],[636.0733124999999,"equilibrium is hidden from the screen — axes left the board."],[636.0733124999999,"contraction is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[636.0733124999999,"stability_heading is hidden from the screen — left the board."]]}]},{"title":"Three Market Prices","start":637.1149791666667,"end":812.8653958333333,"objects":{"comparison":"a Table [text] that says \"Market organization Total quantity Price Monopoly $40$ $60$ Cournot duopoly $160/3 approx 53.3$ $140/3 approx 46.7$ Perfect competition $80$ $20$\" (rows=(('Market organization', 'Total quantity', 'Price'), ('Monopoly…, header=True)","competition_line":"a Line [green] drawn in market (start=(80.0, 0.0), end=(80.0, 20.0), dashed=True)","competition_point":"a PlotPoint [green] labelled \"C\" drawn in market (target='demand', x=80.0)","competition_result":"a Math [text] that says \"$P_(upright(\"PC\"))=20, quad Q_(upright(\"PC\"))=80$\"","cournot_line":"a Line [yellow] drawn in market (start=(53.333333333333336, 0.0), end=(53.333333333333336, 46.666666666666664), dashed=True)","cournot_point":"a PlotPoint [yellow] labelled \"N\" drawn in market (target='demand', x=53.333333333333336)","cournot_work":"a Derivation [text] that says \"$Q_N&=frac(160,3) approx 53.3 \\ P_N&=frac(140,3) approx 46.7$\"","demand":"a FunctionPlot [blue] labelled \"P=100-Q\" drawn in market (function=<function>, x_range=(0.0, 100.0))","heading":"a Heading that says \"Monopoly, Cournot, and Competition\"","marginal_cost":"a FunctionPlot [green] labelled \"upright(\"MC\")=20\" drawn in market (function=<function>, x_range=(0.0, 100.0))","marginal_revenue":"a FunctionPlot [red] labelled \"upright(\"MR\")\" drawn in market (function=<function>, x_range=(0.0, 50.0))","market":"an Axes (x_range=(0.0, 105.0), y_range=(0.0, 105.0), x_ticks_every=20.0)","monopoly_line":"a Line [magenta] drawn in market (start=(40.0, 0.0), end=(40.0, 60.0), dashed=True)","monopoly_point":"a PlotPoint [magenta] labelled \"M\" drawn in market (target='demand', x=40.0)","monopoly_work":"a Derivation [text] that says \"$upright(\"TR\")&=(100-Q)Q \\ upright(\"MR\")&=100-2Q \\ 100-2Q_M&=20 \\ Q_M&=40, quad P_M=60$\"","point":"a Point [yellow] drawn in market (location=(40.0, 20.0))"},"beats":[{"start":637.1149791666667,"say":"Use the same demand and cost curves to compare three market organizations. The blue line is demand and the green line is marginal cost twenty.","live":[],"does":[[637.1149791666667,"heading is shown on the screen, written out."],[637.1149791666667,"market is shown on the screen, written out."],[642.2809791666667,"demand is shown on the screen, drawn."],[644.0579791666667,"marginal_cost is shown on the screen, drawn."]]},{"start":647.3279791666666,"say":"Begin with monopoly. One owner controls the entire market quantity, so its total revenue is price times Q: one hundred minus Q, multiplied by Q.","live":["market","heading","demand","marginal_cost"],"does":[[653.0399791666666,"market moves to a new place on the board."],[653.0399791666666,"monopoly_work is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":659.0389791666666,"say":"Differentiating total revenue gives marginal revenue one hundred minus two Q. The red marginal-revenue curve falls twice as quickly as demand.","live":null,"does":[[661.3499791666667,"monopoly_work is shown on the screen, written out."],[665.2159791666667,"marginal_revenue is shown on the screen, drawn."]]},{"start":669.8789791666667,"say":"The monopolist chooses quantity where marginal revenue equals marginal cost. One hundred minus two Q equals twenty.","live":["market","heading","demand","marginal_cost","marginal_revenue"],"does":[[673.3269791666667,"monopoly_work is shown on the screen, written out."],[677.5069791666667,"point is shown on the screen, grown."]]},{"start":678.9079791666667,"say":"Solving gives monopoly quantity forty. Move up from quantity forty to demand, and buyers pay the monopoly price sixty.","live":["market","heading","demand","marginal_cost","marginal_revenue","point"],"does":[[679.5069791666667,"point is hidden from the screen."],[681.0329791666667,"monopoly_work is shown on the screen, written out."],[682.2049791666667,"monopoly_line is shown on the screen, written out."],[683.6909791666667,"monopoly_point is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":687.6814791666667,"say":"Now return to Cournot. Each firm produces eighty thirds, so together they supply one hundred sixty thirds, about fifty-three point three units.","live":["market","heading","demand","marginal_cost","marginal_revenue","monopoly_line","monopoly_point"],"does":[[688.8999791666666,"cournot_work is shown on the screen, written out."],[696.0059791666666,"cournot_work (the \"Q_N\" part) is emphasized."]]},{"start":698.6954791666667,"say":"Demand at that total quantity gives price one hundred forty thirds, about forty-six point seven. The yellow Cournot point lies down and to the right of monopoly.","live":null,"does":[[701.3769791666666,"cournot_work is shown on the screen, written out."],[701.3769791666666,"cournot_work (the \"Q_N\" part) is no longer emphasized."],[703.5829791666666,"cournot_work (the \"P_N\" part) is emphasized."],[705.9859791666667,"cournot_line is shown on the screen, written out."],[706.2769791666667,"cournot_point is shown on the screen, written out."],[709.5849791666667,"cournot_work (the \"P_N\" part) is no longer emphasized."]]},{"start":710.1849791666666,"say":"Why does Cournot produce more than monopoly? Each firm considers how its own output lowers price, but it does not fully internalize the price loss imposed on the rival's units.","live":["market","heading","demand","marginal_cost","marginal_revenue","monopoly_line","monopoly_point","cournot_line","cournot_point"],"does":[[711.1029791666666,"cournot_point is indicated — a transient flash."],[712.3329791666666,"monopoly_point is indicated — a transient flash."]]},{"start":722.2439791666667,"say":"For perfect competition, firms take price as given and expand until price equals marginal cost. Demand reaches price twenty at total quantity eighty.","live":null,"does":[[723.0569791666667,"competition_result is shown on the screen, written out."],[732.6459791666666,"competition_line is shown on the screen, written out."],[732.6459791666666,"competition_point is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":734.0009791666666,"say":"The ordering is now visible. Monopoly restricts output the most and has the highest price. Cournot lies between. Perfect competition has the largest output and the lowest price.","live":["competition_result","market","heading","demand","marginal_cost","marginal_revenue","monopoly_line","monopoly_point","cournot_line","cournot_point","competition_line","competition_point"],"does":[[736.5669791666667,"monopoly_point is indicated — a transient flash."],[741.0479791666667,"cournot_point is indicated — a transient flash."],[743.0679791666666,"competition_point is indicated — a transient flash."]]},{"start":747.8944791666667,"say":"Numerically, price falls from sixty under monopoly, to about forty-six point seven under Cournot, to twenty under perfect competition.","live":null,"does":[[750.1349791666667,"monopoly_work (the \"P_M=60\" part) is emphasized."],[752.1199791666667,"cournot_work (the \"P_N\" part) is emphasized."],[754.5349791666666,"competition_result (the \"P_(upright(\"PC\"))=20\" part) is emphasized."],[756.4919791666666,"cournot_work (the \"P_N\" part) is no longer emphasized."],[756.4919791666666,"monopoly_work (the \"P_M=60\" part) is no longer emphasized."],[756.4919791666666,"competition_result (the \"P_(upright(\"PC\"))=20\" part) is no longer emphasized."]]},{"start":757.6919791666667,"say":"The table collects the three outcomes. Read the headings first: market organization, total quantity, and market price.","live":null,"does":[[757.6919791666667,"competition_result is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[757.6919791666667,"cournot_work is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[757.6919791666667,"monopoly_work is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[757.6919791666667,"comparison is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":766.5519791666667,"say":"Monopoly produces forty and charges sixty. That row is the benchmark for coordinated quantity restriction.","live":["market","heading","demand","marginal_cost","marginal_revenue","monopoly_line","monopoly_point","cournot_line","cournot_point","competition_line","competition_point"],"does":[[766.8539791666667,"comparison is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":774.8954791666667,"say":"Cournot duopoly produces about fifty-three point three and charges about forty-six point seven. Strategic quantity competition moves the market toward competition, but not all the way.","live":null,"does":[[775.2439791666667,"comparison is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":787.0244791666667,"say":"Perfect competition produces eighty and sets price equal to marginal cost, twenty. Relative to Cournot, another twenty-six point seven units are traded.","live":null,"does":[[787.2449791666667,"comparison is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":798.6534791666667,"say":"The Cournot result is therefore intermediate because firms compete through quantities while retaining some control over market price. If firms compete directly through prices, the strategic logic changes sharply.","live":null,"does":[[799.1879791666667,"comparison is indicated — a transient flash."],[811.8237291666667,"comparison is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[811.8237291666667,"heading is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[811.8237291666667,"market is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[811.8237291666667,"demand is hidden from the screen — market left the board."],[811.8237291666667,"marginal_cost is hidden from the screen — market left the board."],[811.8237291666667,"marginal_revenue is hidden from the screen — market left the board."],[811.8237291666667,"monopoly_line is hidden from the screen — market left the board."],[811.8237291666667,"monopoly_point is hidden from the screen — market left the board."],[811.8237291666667,"cournot_line is hidden from the screen — market left the board."],[811.8237291666667,"cournot_point is hidden from the screen — market left the board."],[811.8237291666667,"competition_line is hidden from the screen — market left the board."],[811.8237291666667,"competition_point is hidden from the screen — market left the board."]]}]},{"title":"Quantity Setting Versus Price Setting","start":812.8653958333333,"end":1035.6055625,"objects":{"benchmark":"a Panel that says \"Two firms sell an identical product, have marginal cost 20, can serve the whole market, and buyers purchase from the lower-price firm.\"","bertrand_equilibrium":"a Math [text] that says \"$p_1^*=p_2^*=c=20$\"","comparison":"a Table [text] that says \"Game Strategic choice Benchmark price Total output Cournot Quantity $140/3 approx 46.7$ $160/3 approx 53.3$ Bertrand Price $20$ $80$\" (rows=(('Game', 'Strategic choice', 'Benchmark price', 'Total output'…, header=True)","comparison_heading":"a Heading that says \"Cournot Beside Bertrand\"","cost_point":"a Point [green] labelled \"c=20\" drawn in price_line (location=(20.0, 0.0))","firm_one_price":"a Point [red] labelled \"p_1=50\" drawn in price_line (location=(<VariableNumber p1 = 20.0>, 0.0))","firm_two_price":"a Point [blue] labelled \"p_2=45\" drawn in price_line (location=(<VariableNumber p2 = 20.0>, 0.0))","heading":"a Heading that says \"What If Firms Set Prices?\"","lowest_price":"a Math [text] that says \"$p_i<p_j arrow.r q_j=0$\"","p1":"a VariableNumber (initial_value=50.0, format_spec='.0f')","p2":"a VariableNumber (initial_value=45.0, format_spec='.0f')","price_line":"a NumberLine labelled \"p\" (x_range=(15.0, 65.0), include_numbers=True, ticks_every=5.0)","qualification":"a Panel that says \"The price-equals-cost result uses homogeneous products, identical marginal costs, sufficient capacity, and frictionless buyer switching. Product differentiation or capacity limits soften the undercutting logic.\"","undercut":"a Math [text] that says \"$p>c arrow.r upright(\"undercut\")$\""},"beats":[{"start":812.8653958333333,"say":"Cournot firms commit to quantities and let market demand determine one common price. Bertrand competition reverses the strategic choice: each firm posts a price.","live":[],"does":[[812.8653958333333,"heading is shown on the screen, written out."],[818.1013958333333,"benchmark is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":824.1463958333333,"say":"Keep the comparison disciplined. The product is identical, both firms have marginal cost twenty, either firm can serve the market, and buyers choose the lower price.","live":["benchmark","heading"],"does":[[830.2533958333333,"price_line is shown on the screen, written out."],[830.2533958333333,"cost_point is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":835.9848958333333,"say":"Suppose Firm 1 posts fifty while Firm 2 posts forty-five. The two colored points display those prices on the same scale.","live":["benchmark","price_line","heading","cost_point"],"does":[[837.7033958333333,"firm_one_price is shown on the screen, written out."],[839.2243958333333,"firm_two_price is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":845.0488958333333,"say":"The lower-price firm serves the market. Buyers do not pay fifty for what they can buy at forty-five, so Firm 2 sells and Firm 1 sells nothing.","live":["benchmark","price_line","heading","cost_point","firm_one_price","firm_two_price"],"does":[[845.0488958333333,"benchmark is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[845.0488958333333,"lowest_price is shown on the screen, written out."],[852.0373958333333,"firm_two_price is indicated — a transient flash."],[854.1153958333333,"firm_one_price is indicated — a transient flash."]]},{"start":855.5398958333333,"say":"Firm 1 can respond by posting forty-four. It gives up one unit of margin relative to forty-five, but captures the market instead of selling zero.","live":["price_line","heading","cost_point","firm_one_price","firm_two_price","lowest_price"],"does":[[857.6643958333333,"firm_one_price is redrawn as the numbers it depends on change."],[857.6643958333333,"p1 ticks to 44.0."]]},{"start":865.9963958333333,"say":"Firm 2 can answer with forty-three. Unlike the Cournot chase, an attractive response here is not a movement toward a smooth quantity curve. It is a price just below the rival.","live":null,"does":[[867.6213958333333,"firm_two_price is redrawn as the numbers it depends on change."],[867.6213958333333,"p2 ticks to 43.0."],[876.8753958333333,"firm_two_price is indicated — a transient flash."]]},{"start":878.3573958333333,"say":"As long as the lower price remains above marginal cost, the higher-price firm can profitably undercut it. So no common price above twenty can be an equilibrium.","live":null,"does":[[880.4703958333333,"undercut is shown on the screen, written out."],[880.4703958333333,"undercut (the \"p>c\" part) is emphasized."],[889.2823958333333,"undercut (the \"p>c\" part) is no longer emphasized."]]},{"start":889.8823958333332,"say":"Continue the undercutting pressure toward cost. Both price points move down the scale and arrive at twenty.","live":["price_line","heading","cost_point","firm_one_price","firm_two_price","lowest_price","undercut"],"does":[[892.2853958333333,"firm_one_price is redrawn as the numbers it depends on change."],[892.2853958333333,"firm_two_price is redrawn as the numbers it depends on change."],[892.2853958333333,"p1 ticks to 20.0."],[892.2853958333333,"p2 ticks to 20.0."]]},{"start":897.7733958333333,"say":"At a common price of twenty, neither firm can gain by charging more, because it would lose its customers. Neither can gain by charging less, because price would fall below marginal cost.","live":null,"does":[[899.0503958333334,"bertrand_equilibrium is shown on the screen, written out."],[908.0953958333333,"cost_point is indicated — a transient flash."]]},{"start":910.0188958333333,"say":"The Bertrand equilibrium is therefore price equal to marginal cost under these assumptions. Total demand at price twenty is eighty, the same total output as the perfectly competitive benchmark.","live":["price_line","heading","cost_point","firm_one_price","firm_two_price","lowest_price","undercut","bertrand_equilibrium"],"does":[[911.0403958333334,"A box is drawn around bertrand_equilibrium."]]},{"start":922.8668958333333,"say":"This is the central contrast. Under Cournot, a firm choosing more output depresses the price on all units, so each firm restrains quantity. Under Bertrand, a slightly lower price can redirect the whole market.","live":null,"does":[[935.0923958333333,"firm_one_price is indicated — a transient flash."],[936.4743958333333,"firm_two_price is indicated — a transient flash."]]},{"start":938.1308958333333,"say":"Quantity competition therefore leaves price above marginal cost in our two-firm example. Direct price competition drives the benchmark price down to marginal cost.","live":null,"does":[[948.8463958333333,"bertrand_equilibrium is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[948.8463958333333,"heading is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[948.8463958333333,"lowest_price is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[948.8463958333333,"price_line is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[948.8463958333333,"cost_point is hidden from the screen — price_line left the board."],[948.8463958333333,"firm_one_price is hidden from the screen — price_line left the board."],[948.8463958333333,"firm_two_price is hidden from the screen — price_line left the board."],[948.8463958333333,"undercut is hidden from the screen — left the board."]]},{"start":950.0463958333333,"say":"Place the two games side by side. The table names the strategic choice, equilibrium price, and total output.","live":[],"does":[[950.0463958333333,"comparison_heading is shown on the screen, written out."],[953.1813958333333,"comparison is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":958.8893958333333,"say":"In Cournot, firms choose quantities. Their best-response crossing gives price about forty-six point seven and total output about fifty-three point three.","live":["comparison_heading"],"does":[[959.6323958333334,"comparison is shown on the screen, written out."],[965.0543958333333,"comparison (the \"$140/3 approx 46.7$\" part) is indicated — a transient flash."]]},{"start":970.0658958333333,"say":"In the homogeneous-product Bertrand benchmark, firms choose prices. Undercutting gives price twenty and total output eighty.","live":null,"does":[[972.2023958333333,"comparison is shown on the screen, written out."],[976.9623958333333,"comparison (the \"$20$\" part) is indicated — a transient flash."]]},{"start":979.9653958333333,"say":"Do not treat that sharp result as a law for every price-setting market. If products differ, customers may stay with a higher-price seller. If capacity is limited, the cheaper firm may be unable to serve everyone.","live":null,"does":[[981.1383958333333,"qualification is shown on the screen, written out."]]},{"start":994.2188958333334,"say":"Different marginal costs, search costs, repeated interaction, and capacity constraints can also sustain prices above the simplest Bertrand level. The comparison works because we held the environment fixed and changed the strategic variable.","live":["qualification","comparison_heading"],"does":[]},{"start":1010.1908958333333,"say":"The full lesson is now one connected argument. Demand turns two quantities into one price. Profit maximization turns each rival quantity into a best response. Alternating responses converge to the Cournot crossing. That crossing prices below monopoly but above competition, while direct price setting creates the undercutting race to marginal cost.","live":null,"does":[[1016.1933958333333,"comparison is indicated — a transient flash."],[1024.7263958333333,"comparison is indicated — a transient flash."],[1034.5638958333334,"comparison is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[1034.5638958333334,"comparison_heading is hidden from the screen — left the board."],[1034.5638958333334,"qualification is hidden from the screen — left the board."]]}]}]},"durationSeconds":1036,"chapters":[{"title":"The Market and the Destination","startSeconds":0,"narration":"Two firms will choose quantities. Each red or green curve will record one firm's best answer to the other firm's output. Their crossing is the destination of the lecture. At the yellow crossing, Firm 1 is already answering Firm 2 as well as it can, and Firm 2 is already answering Firm 1. Neither wants to change alone. That is the Cournot-Nash equilibrium. But I do not want that crossing to arrive as a mysterious pair of lines. We will build each line from profit, then let the firms chase one another toward the crossing. Begin with a deliberately simple market. The horizontal coordinate is total quantity Q. The vertical coordinate is the market price P. Demand is the blue line P equals one hundred minus Q. If total output is twenty, buyers pay eighty. If output rises, the price paid for every unit falls. Move total output from twenty to sixty. The market point slides down the demand curve, and price falls from eighty to forty. Quantity decisions therefore interact through one common price. Bring output back to forty. The corresponding price is sixty. We will later recognize this as the output and price a single profit-maximizing firm would choose. With two firms, total quantity is Firm 1's output plus Firm 2's output. The market does not care which firm supplied a unit. It sees only their sum. Both firms have constant marginal cost twenty and no fixed cost. The green line therefore stays flat at twenty, however much either firm produces. A firm's profit is its margin, price minus twenty, multiplied by its own quantity. The important word is own. Firm 1 earns the market margin on q one, not on its rival's production. Substitute the market price and total output. Profit becomes eighty minus q one minus q two, multiplied by the firm's own quantity. That expression contains the strategic tension. Producing another unit sells one more unit, but it also lowers the price received on every unit the firm already sells. Cournot competition asks each firm to choose its own quantity while treating the rival's quantity as given. We now solve that decision for Firm 1, first with a numerical guess and then for every possible guess."},{"title":"Building the Best-Response Curves","startSeconds":158.3292083333333,"narration":"Suppose Firm 1 believes Firm 2 will produce twenty units. Firm 1 now faces a one-variable decision: choose q one to maximize its own profit. The blue curve plots that profit against Firm 1's quantity. Profit is zero at quantity zero, rises, reaches a top, and eventually falls as the price effect overwhelms the extra sales. Try q one equal to ten. The market quantity is thirty, price is seventy, and Firm 1 earns a margin of fifty on ten units, or five hundred. Substituting the rival's twenty units leaves sixty minus q one, multiplied by q one. Expanding gives sixty q one minus q one squared. Move the trial quantity to thirty. The point climbs to the top of the profit curve. Here Firm 1 sells thirty units at a margin of thirty. Move farther to fifty. Profit falls back to five hundred. More output is not automatically better, because the common market price has fallen. Differentiate the quadratic. The marginal effect of q one is sixty minus two q one. Setting that equal to zero gives q one equal to thirty. So thirty is Firm 1's best response to a rival output of twenty. Now let the rival's quantity vary instead of fixing it at one number. Put Firm 2's output on the horizontal axis and Firm 1's output on the vertical axis. We want one point for every possible guess about q two. Firm 1's general profit is eighty minus q one minus q two, multiplied by q one. Expanding separates the own-output square from the interaction with the rival. Differentiate with respect to Firm 1's own quantity while holding q two fixed. The first-order condition is eighty minus two q one minus q two equal to zero. Solving gives q one equal to one half of eighty minus q two. This is not one answer. It is a rule assigning a profit-maximizing q one to every possible q two. Plot that rule in red. If Firm 2 produces zero, Firm 1 behaves like the market's sole producer and chooses forty. If Firm 2 produces twenty, Firm 1 chooses the thirty we just found. The red curve slopes downward because the quantities are strategic substitutes. A larger rival output depresses market price, so Firm 1's best reply is to produce less. Firm 2 solves the mirror-image problem. Its profit is the same market margin multiplied by q two. Differentiate with respect to q two. The first-order condition is eighty minus q one minus two q two equal to zero. Solving gives Firm 2's response: q two equals one half of eighty minus q one. The two firms have identical technologies and face the same demand. On axes ordered q two across and q one up, that response appears as the green curve. Every point on it is an output pair where Firm 2 is optimizing against Firm 1. The red curve records where Firm 1 is content. The green curve records where Firm 2 is content. Only their crossing makes both statements true at the same time. Because the firms are identical, the crossing lies on the dashed symmetry line q one equals q two. Call their common output q. Substitute q for the rival's output in either response rule. q equals one half of eighty minus q, so three q equals eighty. Each firm produces eighty thirds, about twenty-six point seven units. The yellow point is therefore the unique crossing of the two best-response curves. This algebra identifies the fixed point. It has not yet shown whether decentralized adjustment finds it. For that, we let the firms respond one after the other and watch the chase."},{"title":"The Best-Response Chase","startSeconds":424.37760416666663,"narration":"Return to the quantity plane. The red and green response curves are fixed. The blue point will record the firms' current output pair, with q two across and q one up. Start away from equilibrium at q two equal to ten and q one equal to ten. The point is on neither response curve, so both firms currently want to revise. Firm 1 moves first. It treats q two equal to ten as fixed and chooses one half of seventy, so the point moves vertically and lands at thirty-five. Now Firm 2 observes q one equal to thirty-five. Its best response is twenty-two point five, so the point moves horizontally and lands on the green curve. Firm 1 responds again. Against twenty-two point five, its maximizing quantity is twenty-eight point seven five. The red vertical step is already much shorter than the first. Firm 2 answers with twenty-five point six. The green horizontal step is shorter as well. The pair has entered the narrow region between the two curves. Another Firm 1 response gives about twenty-seven point two. It still overshoots the crossing slightly, but by less than before. Firm 2 then chooses about twenty-six point four. The alternating steps produce a staircase: red movements are Firm 1, and green movements are Firm 2. Firm 1 now moves to about twenty-six point eight. The vertical correction has become small enough that the displayed coordinates begin to agree in their first two digits. Firm 2 replies with about twenty-six point six. The horizontal correction is smaller again. One more Firm 1 response gives about twenty-six point seven. The point is now visually almost at the crossing. Firm 2 answers at about twenty-six point seven as well. The staircase has tightened around the yellow Cournot-Nash point. The motion itself suggests stability. A displacement away from the crossing generates a smaller response in the opposite direction, then a still smaller reply. We can measure that shrinkage. Let e one and e two denote each firm's output minus its equilibrium output. Firm 1's response curve has slope minus one half. Therefore Firm 1's new error is minus one half of Firm 2's old error. Firm 2's response also has slope minus one half. Its new error is minus one half of Firm 1's new error. Multiplying the two slopes gives positive one quarter. After one complete Firm 1 and Firm 2 round, the remaining error has only one quarter of its previous magnitude. That is why the staircase contracts rather than exploding outward. The negative slopes make successive corrections alternate sides, while their product being smaller than one makes the corrections shrink. The conclusion is conditional, not universal. We assumed exact best responses, one firm moving at a time, and an unchanged demand and cost environment. Different adjustment rules can create slower motion, simultaneous jumps, or instability. Under this benchmark, however, equilibrium is both a pair of mutual best responses and the stable fixed point of the visible chase. We can now ask what market price that fixed point produces."},{"title":"Three Market Prices","startSeconds":637.1149791666667,"narration":"Use the same demand and cost curves to compare three market organizations. The blue line is demand and the green line is marginal cost twenty. Begin with monopoly. One owner controls the entire market quantity, so its total revenue is price times Q: one hundred minus Q, multiplied by Q. Differentiating total revenue gives marginal revenue one hundred minus two Q. The red marginal-revenue curve falls twice as quickly as demand. The monopolist chooses quantity where marginal revenue equals marginal cost. One hundred minus two Q equals twenty. Solving gives monopoly quantity forty. Move up from quantity forty to demand, and buyers pay the monopoly price sixty. Now return to Cournot. Each firm produces eighty thirds, so together they supply one hundred sixty thirds, about fifty-three point three units. Demand at that total quantity gives price one hundred forty thirds, about forty-six point seven. The yellow Cournot point lies down and to the right of monopoly. Why does Cournot produce more than monopoly? Each firm considers how its own output lowers price, but it does not fully internalize the price loss imposed on the rival's units. For perfect competition, firms take price as given and expand until price equals marginal cost. Demand reaches price twenty at total quantity eighty. The ordering is now visible. Monopoly restricts output the most and has the highest price. Cournot lies between. Perfect competition has the largest output and the lowest price. Numerically, price falls from sixty under monopoly, to about forty-six point seven under Cournot, to twenty under perfect competition. The table collects the three outcomes. Read the headings first: market organization, total quantity, and market price. Monopoly produces forty and charges sixty. That row is the benchmark for coordinated quantity restriction. Cournot duopoly produces about fifty-three point three and charges about forty-six point seven. Strategic quantity competition moves the market toward competition, but not all the way. Perfect competition produces eighty and sets price equal to marginal cost, twenty. Relative to Cournot, another twenty-six point seven units are traded. The Cournot result is therefore intermediate because firms compete through quantities while retaining some control over market price. If firms compete directly through prices, the strategic logic changes sharply."},{"title":"Quantity Setting Versus Price Setting","startSeconds":812.8653958333333,"narration":"Cournot firms commit to quantities and let market demand determine one common price. Bertrand competition reverses the strategic choice: each firm posts a price. Keep the comparison disciplined. The product is identical, both firms have marginal cost twenty, either firm can serve the market, and buyers choose the lower price. Suppose Firm 1 posts fifty while Firm 2 posts forty-five. The two colored points display those prices on the same scale. The lower-price firm serves the market. Buyers do not pay fifty for what they can buy at forty-five, so Firm 2 sells and Firm 1 sells nothing. Firm 1 can respond by posting forty-four. It gives up one unit of margin relative to forty-five, but captures the market instead of selling zero. Firm 2 can answer with forty-three. Unlike the Cournot chase, an attractive response here is not a movement toward a smooth quantity curve. It is a price just below the rival. As long as the lower price remains above marginal cost, the higher-price firm can profitably undercut it. So no common price above twenty can be an equilibrium. Continue the undercutting pressure toward cost. Both price points move down the scale and arrive at twenty. At a common price of twenty, neither firm can gain by charging more, because it would lose its customers. Neither can gain by charging less, because price would fall below marginal cost. The Bertrand equilibrium is therefore price equal to marginal cost under these assumptions. Total demand at price twenty is eighty, the same total output as the perfectly competitive benchmark. This is the central contrast. Under Cournot, a firm choosing more output depresses the price on all units, so each firm restrains quantity. Under Bertrand, a slightly lower price can redirect the whole market. Quantity competition therefore leaves price above marginal cost in our two-firm example. Direct price competition drives the benchmark price down to marginal cost. Place the two games side by side. The table names the strategic choice, equilibrium price, and total output. In Cournot, firms choose quantities. Their best-response crossing gives price about forty-six point seven and total output about fifty-three point three. In the homogeneous-product Bertrand benchmark, firms choose prices. Undercutting gives price twenty and total output eighty. Do not treat that sharp result as a law for every price-setting market. If products differ, customers may stay with a higher-price seller. If capacity is limited, the cheaper firm may be unable to serve everyone. Different marginal costs, search costs, repeated interaction, and capacity constraints can also sustain prices above the simplest Bertrand level. The comparison works because we held the environment fixed and changed the strategic variable. The full lesson is now one connected argument. Demand turns two quantities into one price. Profit maximization turns each rival quantity into a best response. Alternating responses converge to the Cournot crossing. That crossing prices below monopoly but above competition, while direct price setting creates the undercutting race to marginal cost."}]}}
